PiSyuN | Identifier

/15

PiSyuN : Noun

A distinct piece–of–shit that belongs to the wonderful classification of likely being a Psychopath, Sociopath or a Narcissist. In politics, they destroy economies because they feel bored or need to one-up another PiSyuN. They will only help you if it benefits them. In relationships, they manipulate by using very ambiguous language to misdirect – like a “magician” using a slight of hand. There is no certainty.

 

However, with some assistance from those who bought into the snake juice sales pitch, I have built this simple questionnaire that should help you determine if the person you may be dealing with is a PiSyuN or not. No gimmicks, no sales pitches, just a logical approach.

 

THIS IS A WORK-IN-PROGRESS. Please excuse any grammar, repeated logic / questions, and other nonsense.

 

 

Keep in mind, PiSyuNs are very innovative in their approaches and, in the future, this may become their guide to what not to say or how to hide their tendencies – it’s OK, we will just make this tool better. Special “Thanks” goes out to Marina and Natasha in their contribution from their unfortunate dealings with the pieces-of-shit. RULE OF THUMB is that the PiSyuNs gravitate to take the path of LEAST RESISTANCE, as effort is their KRYPTONITE. Words is what they use to manipulate you. Ask for proof that you can VERIFY and when you do, expect excuses that have emotional component redirected at you such as, “Why don’t you trust me?”

 

 

1 / 15

Do they utilize a lot of absolutes in their communication particularly during arguments or to emphasize their point? Examples of absolutes are :

“ALWAYS” “NEVER” “EVERYBODY” “NOBODY” “NOONE” “EVERYONE” “EVERYTHING” “NOTHING” “ALL” “NONE” “ONLY” “NONE” “EVER” “PERFECT“

They key difference is that you can come up with examples that make absolutes INVALID. Absolutes are meant to confuse and disorient through generalization.

 

FYI : Children tend to utilize absolutes like “Nobody ever tells me anything”

 

2 / 15

Do they use unjustified flattery [ usually tends to happen at the beginning ]? This is, usually, accompanied by an exclamation point. Examples are :

  • Wow, you are so amazing!
  • You are incredible!
  • I am so impressed!
  • I can’t believe you did that!

 

3 / 15

Do they tell you a glorious history of their accomplishments / relationships, yet it’s almost impossible to verify? For example :

“I was a crypto-millionaire until I got hacked and all my millions were stolen.” [ hard to verify ]

“P. Diddy and I used to text frequently but I don’t have his new phone number.” [ right ]

There are usually slight inconsistencies each time the story is told.

 

4 / 15

Do they refer to any of their exes as “crazy” or “obsessed“?

 

 

 

5 / 15

Do they have hard time apologizing for making a mistake and can come up with an excuse why they made a mistake most of the time?

 

6 / 15

Do they tend to utilize nonsensical and “wishful” phrases that imply / suggest / intend action [ with almost no proof / action to substantiate ] :

“I want to” | “I wanted to”

Or another wonderful phrasing like :

“I should” | “I should have”

 

7 / 15

Do they tend to have the right answer or be able to say the right thing but have very little substance behind what they say?

For example, they tell you that they are the most caring person in the world. However, you have no proof to support that. They are likely a PiSyuN. Non-PiSyuN rarely tells you about how wonderful they are. Key is VERIFIABLE.

 

8 / 15

Have you seen a movie called “Good on Paper”? If so, are you able to see similarities to the individual you are being entertained by?

 

9 / 15

PiSyuNs tend to refuse to use ChatGPT to come up with solutions, despite them being able to contribute to the discussion.

 

10 / 15

Would they be willing to provide contacts of their exes for you to find out what you might be in for [ while keeping an open mind ]?

 

11 / 15

PiSyuNs LOVE to use “I don’t know” to create ambiguity. For example, if you ask a PiSyuN – “Would you like a glass of water?“, they will respond with, “I don’t know” – despite thirst being a very basic yes / no. They will justify it with, “I feel conflicted because …” [ giving you dozens of excuses ]. It’s easy to come up with “conflicting” perspective that doesn’t give you a direct answer.

Let’s get down to basics. A PiSyuN has a hard time answering, “Do you feel thirsty?“

Why do they do this? It’s to manipulate you to know / anticipate for them. “I do NOT know” puts the pressure on you to figure out what that means. You stand there, confused. You weren’t given any answer, just an excuse not to give an answer. No matter what you do, whether you bring the water or not, you are at a disadvantage.

What stops a PiSyuN from responding with, “I do not know right now, can I respond to you in 10 minutes?” [ which puts the liability on themselves, which is proper since you are the one offering the effort ] or how about, “I do not know right now, can you, please, ask me again, in 10 minutes?” [ a polite form of request ].

So, the question is related to, “I don’t know” – are you given a solution or are you given ambiguity?

 

12 / 15

PiSyuNs tend to redirect requests you pose back at you to not feel like you owe them. For example, “Would you like to have some of my French Fries?” and they would respond with some indirect garbage like, “Only if you want to give me some.“

They tend to RARELY have a direct response.

Lets say you try to clarify, “I am asking you, would you like some of my French Fries, yes or no? It’s not a trick question – I am just offering you.” and they respond with anything other than “yes” or “no” …

So, this question is to figure out inability to accept or deny an offering in a direct manner.

 

13 / 15

PiSyuNs have a VERY difficult time committing to inquiries. Ambiguity gives them a chance to get out of the outcome no matter the decision and places the liability of the decision on YOU.

For example, “I don’t care, you decide – you know what I want.” So, when you decide and something doesn’t work out, guess what? It’s YOUR fault since you made a decision. Not only that, they justify their indecisiveness with nonsense like, “I have no opinion because yours matters more.” BRILLIANT! They can’t lose.

Objective : To make sure that they can blame you on the outcome.

So, is somebody you are talking to tend to push the decisions on to you through indirect language?

 

14 / 15

PiSyuNs do NOT propose solutions and when they do, it is conditional in such a way that benefits them or avoid them making effort. When you propose solutions, they look for ways your solution does not work. Then, they blame you for NOT figuring out a solution. They are not even willing to deploy a solution because they can figure out how the solution will fail – yet, they don’t propose a constructive solution. Usually, they propose a solution where you have to ignore your morals. It aligns with, “I get to do what I want even if what you propose is reasonable.“

Question : Are they able to deploy a solution before finding faults in it?

 

15 / 15

PiSyuNs do NOT volunteer information that they know you wouldn’t approve of and would like to hear. They do so to avoid consequences, like children. They will choose to use ambiguous language and blame [ use excuses ] to make a condition be the culprit. Question, do they volunteer information that is against their interest?

 

0%