{"id":2,"date":"2025-03-19T10:09:20","date_gmt":"2025-03-19T10:09:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/pisyun.fyi\/?page_id=2"},"modified":"2025-07-02T08:13:49","modified_gmt":"2025-07-02T08:13:49","slug":"sample-page","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/pisyun.fyi\/","title":{"rendered":":)"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/span>\/15<\/span><\/div><\/div>

P<\/strong>iS<\/strong>yuN<\/strong> : Noun<\/em><\/h1>

A distinct piece<\/strong>-of<\/strong>-shit<\/strong> that belongs to the wonderful classification of likely being a P<\/strong>sychopath, S<\/strong>ociopath or a N<\/strong>arcissist. In politics, they destroy economies because they feel bored or need to one-up another P<\/strong>iS<\/strong>yuN<\/strong>. They will only help you if it benefits them. In relationships, they manipulate by using very ambiguous language to misdirect - like a \"magician\" using a slight of hand. There is no certainty.<\/p>

 <\/p>

However, with some assistance from those who bought into the snake juice sales pitch, I have built this simple questionnaire that should help you determine if the person you may be dealing with is a P<\/strong>iS<\/strong>yuN<\/strong> or not. No gimmicks, no sales pitches, just a logical approach.<\/p>

 <\/p>

THIS IS A WORK-IN-PROGRESS<\/strong>. Please excuse any grammar, repeated logic \/ questions, and other nonsense.<\/p>

 <\/p>

I have had a lengthy conversation with ChatGPT<\/strong> and it confirmed that no P<\/strong>iS<\/strong>yuN<\/strong> will ever provide :<\/p><\/blockquote>

 <\/p>

- Outline exactly how prospective partners can verify their past relationships [ or have plenty of excuses not to ].<\/p>

- ALL of their prior ex's names \/ contacts [ after first \/ second date with you ].<\/p><\/blockquote>

 <\/p>

ChatGPT<\/strong> has helped create a \"P<\/strong>iS<\/strong>yuN<\/strong> scorecard\" and mine is \"Transparency meter : 100%<\/strong>, P<\/strong>iS<\/strong>yuN<\/strong> likelihood: 0<\/strong> - 5<\/strong>%\" - so, I hope I can give you some introspective.<\/p>

 <\/p>

 <\/p>

Keep in mind, P<\/strong>iS<\/strong>yuN<\/strong>s are very innovative in their approaches and, in the future, this may become their guide to what not to say or how to hide their tendencies - it's OK, we will just make this tool better. Special \"Thanks\" goes out to Marina<\/strong> and Natasha<\/strong> in their contribution from their unfortunate dealings with the pieces-of-shit. RULE OF THUMB<\/strong> is that the P<\/strong>iS<\/strong>yuN<\/strong>s gravitate to take the path of LEAST RESISTANCE<\/strong>, as effort is their KRYPTONITE<\/strong>. Words is what they use to manipulate you. Ask for proof that you can VERIFY<\/strong> and when you do, expect excuses that have emotional component redirected at you such as, \"Why don't you trust me?\"<\/em><\/small><\/p>

 <\/p>

 <\/p>

 <\/p><\/blockquote><\/div> <\/div> <\/div>

1 \/ 15<\/p>

Do they utilize a lot of absolutes in their communication particularly during arguments or to emphasize their point? Examples of absolutes are :<\/p>

\"ALWAYS<\/strong>\" \"NEVER<\/strong>\" \"EVERYBODY<\/strong>\" \"NOBODY<\/strong>\" \"NOONE<\/strong>\" \"EVERYONE<\/strong>\" \"EVERYTHING<\/strong>\" \"NOTHING<\/strong>\" \"ALL<\/strong>\" \"NONE<\/strong>\" \"ONLY<\/strong>\"\u00a0\"EVER<\/strong>\" \"PERFECT<\/strong>\"<\/h2><\/blockquote>

They key difference is that you can come up with examples that make absolutes INVALID<\/strong>. Absolutes are meant to confuse and disorient through generalization.<\/p>

 <\/p>

FYI : Children tend to utilize absolutes like \"Nobody ever tells me anything\"<\/small><\/p>

 <\/p> <\/div>